Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of CENVAT Credit - export of services - Period of limitation - Though the original authority has rendered a finding that the refund claim is hit by time-bar, such finding is not supported by any reasons and there is no discussion as to the computation made by him for arriving at the conclusion that the refund claim is hit by time-bar. As per notification itself, it can be seen that the refund claims are filed in each quarter. The contention of the learned AR that when computed from the first day of relevant quarter, the claim is beyond one year cannot be accepted since section 11B stipulates that the period of one year has to be computed from the relevant date and the relevant date is also explained in the said section. - AT
Refund of CENVAT Credit - export of services - Period of limitation - Though the original authority has rendered a finding that the refund claim is hit by time-bar, such finding is not supported by any reasons and there is no discussion as to the computation made by him for arriving at the conclusion that the refund claim is hit by time-bar. As per notification itself, it can be seen that the refund claims are filed in each quarter. The contention of the learned AR that when computed from the first day of relevant quarter, the claim is beyond one year cannot be accepted since section 11B stipulates that the period of one year has to be computed from the relevant date and the relevant date is also explained in the said section. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.