Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Validity of order of Settlement Commission u/s 245D(4) - In this case, the 2nd respondent has been ill advised to not to make true and full disclosure and to take a chance considering the fact that the scope of enquiry before the 1st respondent Settlement Commission is a summary proceeding and proceeds on the principle of trust and assumption that an applicant has made a bona fide disclosure for settling the case. The 1st respondent merely relies on the inputs given by the departments to verify the claim of an income tax assessee. - no additional amount of income was offered over and above the amount disclosed in the returns filed u/s 139 - The impugned order is set aside. The case is remitted back to the jurisdictional AO to complete the assessments - HC
Validity of order of Settlement Commission u/s 245D(4) - In this case, the 2nd respondent has been ill advised to not to make true and full disclosure and to take a chance considering the fact that the scope of enquiry before the 1st respondent Settlement Commission is a summary proceeding and proceeds on the principle of trust and assumption that an applicant has made a bona fide disclosure for settling the case. The 1st respondent merely relies on the inputs given by the departments to verify the claim of an income tax assessee. - no additional amount of income was offered over and above the amount disclosed in the returns filed u/s 139 - The impugned order is set aside. The case is remitted back to the jurisdictional AO to complete the assessments - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
