Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Refund of accumulated credit - rejection on the ground that there was no “Physical Export” under Rule 5 - It is undisputed that for the period from January2014 to December-2014 the present appellant had claimed similar refund of Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the said Rules on the ground that said credit remained unutilized due to clearances of the final products under ICB. - the clearances made by the appellant herein to ICB had to be considered as exports for being entitled to claim refund of Cenvat credit. - HC
Refund of accumulated credit - rejection on the ground that there was no “Physical Export” under Rule 5 - It is undisputed that for the period from January2014 to December-2014 the present appellant had claimed similar refund of Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the said Rules on the ground that said credit remained unutilized due to clearances of the final products under ICB. - the clearances made by the appellant herein to ICB had to be considered as exports for being entitled to claim refund of Cenvat credit. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
