Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Change of opinion - As has always been observed, notice under Section 147 is not to be casually invoked to suit the convenience of the Department or to correct any alleged errors which would have been committed by the Assessing Officer. In the instant case, we find that, not only the ingredients required to be fulfilled in the first proviso to Section 147 have not been fulfilled, there is no allegation made against the assessee for not having made full or true disclosure of all material particulars and the reopening of the assessment would also be barred in terms of the third proviso to Section 147 - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Change of opinion - As has always been observed, notice under Section 147 is not to be casually invoked to suit the convenience of the Department or to correct any alleged errors which would have been committed by the Assessing Officer. In the instant case, we find that, not only the ingredients required to be fulfilled in the first proviso to Section 147 have not been fulfilled, there is no allegation made against the assessee for not having made full or true disclosure of all material particulars and the reopening of the assessment would also be barred in terms of the third proviso to Section 147 - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.