Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Addition u/s 68 - In the given case, AO has not carried out any useful investigation but merely followed the previous pattern of investigation and completed the assessment on preconceived notion that the parties are bogus without really verifying the real aspect - the assessee has clearly given the details of suppliers and parties with whom the assessee has made purchases and sales to Revenue authorities, not only the address but also the PAN details, sales tax details, bank details, etc., AO cannot verify one aspect of identifying the parties and neglecting the other important aspect of identification and comes to conclusion which itself is not proper. - Additions deleted - AT
Addition u/s 68 - In the given case, AO has not carried out any useful investigation but merely followed the previous pattern of investigation and completed the assessment on preconceived notion that the parties are bogus without really verifying the real aspect - the assessee has clearly given the details of suppliers and parties with whom the assessee has made purchases and sales to Revenue authorities, not only the address but also the PAN details, sales tax details, bank details, etc., AO cannot verify one aspect of identifying the parties and neglecting the other important aspect of identification and comes to conclusion which itself is not proper. - Additions deleted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
