Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Appointment of respondents 4 and 5 to the office of the Vice President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - principal objection of the petitioner is that these interim orders of the Apex Court do not apply to an appointment made on 22.01.2020 - The petitioner has completely failed to establish that the appointments are contrary to the relevant parent Act or the rules framed thereunder. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petitioner’s challenge - HC
Appointment of respondents 4 and 5 to the office of the Vice President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - principal objection of the petitioner is that these interim orders of the Apex Court do not apply to an appointment made on 22.01.2020 - The petitioner has completely failed to establish that the appointments are contrary to the relevant parent Act or the rules framed thereunder. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petitioner’s challenge - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
