Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Appointment of respondents 4 and 5 to the office of the Vice President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - principal objection of the petitioner is that these interim orders of the Apex Court do not apply to an appointment made on 22.01.2020 - The petitioner has completely failed to establish that the appointments are contrary to the relevant parent Act or the rules framed thereunder. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petitioner’s challenge - HC
Appointment of respondents 4 and 5 to the office of the Vice President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - principal objection of the petitioner is that these interim orders of the Apex Court do not apply to an appointment made on 22.01.2020 - The petitioner has completely failed to establish that the appointments are contrary to the relevant parent Act or the rules framed thereunder. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petitioner’s challenge - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
