Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appointment of respondents 4 and 5 to the office of the Vice President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - principal objection of the petitioner is that these interim orders of the Apex Court do not apply to an appointment made on 22.01.2020 - The petitioner has completely failed to establish that the appointments are contrary to the relevant parent Act or the rules framed thereunder. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petitioner’s challenge - HC
Appointment of respondents 4 and 5 to the office of the Vice President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - principal objection of the petitioner is that these interim orders of the Apex Court do not apply to an appointment made on 22.01.2020 - The petitioner has completely failed to establish that the appointments are contrary to the relevant parent Act or the rules framed thereunder. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petitioner’s challenge - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
