Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Bogus LTCG - Long-term capital gain exempt under Section 10(38) denied - Even if name of the appellant appeared in their statements, it could not have been used against the appellant until and unless the appellant was allowed an opportunity to cross examine the person whose statement was recorded during the course of survey/searches. - the material as received by the assessing officer behind the back of the appellant cannot be used against the appellant. - AT
Bogus LTCG - Long-term capital gain exempt under Section 10(38) denied - Even if name of the appellant appeared in their statements, it could not have been used against the appellant until and unless the appellant was allowed an opportunity to cross examine the person whose statement was recorded during the course of survey/searches. - the material as received by the assessing officer behind the back of the appellant cannot be used against the appellant. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.