Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Bogus LTCG - Long-term capital gain exempt under Section 10(38) denied - Even if name of the appellant appeared in their statements, it could not have been used against the appellant until and unless the appellant was allowed an opportunity to cross examine the person whose statement was recorded during the course of survey/searches. - the material as received by the assessing officer behind the back of the appellant cannot be used against the appellant. - AT
Bogus LTCG - Long-term capital gain exempt under Section 10(38) denied - Even if name of the appellant appeared in their statements, it could not have been used against the appellant until and unless the appellant was allowed an opportunity to cross examine the person whose statement was recorded during the course of survey/searches. - the material as received by the assessing officer behind the back of the appellant cannot be used against the appellant. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.