Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Bogus LTCG - Long-term capital gain exempt under Section 10(38) denied - Even if name of the appellant appeared in their statements, it could not have been used against the appellant until and unless the appellant was allowed an opportunity to cross examine the person whose statement was recorded during the course of survey/searches. - the material as received by the assessing officer behind the back of the appellant cannot be used against the appellant. - AT
Bogus LTCG - Long-term capital gain exempt under Section 10(38) denied - Even if name of the appellant appeared in their statements, it could not have been used against the appellant until and unless the appellant was allowed an opportunity to cross examine the person whose statement was recorded during the course of survey/searches. - the material as received by the assessing officer behind the back of the appellant cannot be used against the appellant. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.