Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Exemption u/s. 10(23C)(vi) denied - eligibility to Assessment u/s 11 - Charitable activity u/s 2(15) - an expenditure which did not even form a part of application claimed - As the assessee wholly and exclusively carried out its objects for which it was established and even if there is a violation as suggested by CCIT, it was not claimed for the purpose of application of income. - AT
Exemption u/s. 10(23C)(vi) denied - eligibility to Assessment u/s 11 - Charitable activity u/s 2(15) - an expenditure which did not even form a part of application claimed - As the assessee wholly and exclusively carried out its objects for which it was established and even if there is a violation as suggested by CCIT, it was not claimed for the purpose of application of income. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.