Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Addition u/s 43CA - difference between agreement value of the flats and market value determined by the DVO - in the light of reasoning given for insertion of the proviso and exposition by the Tribunal for retrospective application of the said proviso, have no hesitation in holding that the proviso to sub-section (1) to section 43CA and the subsequent amendment thereto relates back to the date on which the said section was made effective i.e. 01/4/2014. - AT
Addition u/s 43CA - difference between agreement value of the flats and market value determined by the DVO - in the light of reasoning given for insertion of the proviso and exposition by the Tribunal for retrospective application of the said proviso, have no hesitation in holding that the proviso to sub-section (1) to section 43CA and the subsequent amendment thereto relates back to the date on which the said section was made effective i.e. 01/4/2014. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.