Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Reassessment notices and limitation: SC required High Courts to first ermine whether cases fell in Assessment Year 2015-16.
    Natural justice in assessment requires full disclosure of departmental material before adverse findings can be made.
    Natural justice breach invalidated an assessment where relied-upon search material was not supplied to the assessee for rebuttal.
    Section 80P deduction upheld for credit co-operative society's bank interest earned on liquidity and operational deposits.
    Concessional corporate tax rate turns on prior-year turnover verification, with remand for examination of audited financials.
    Genuineness of political donation claim under section 80-GGC failed on surrounding facts, so deduction was denied.
    Defective penalty charge under section 270A and bona fide reliance on Form 16 justified deletion of penalty.
    Reassessment notice validity and bogus purchase additions: ITAT upheld reopening, but remanded the purchase dispute for fresh verification.
    Mandatory prior intimation under section 143(1)(a) is required before denying concessional tax treatment in return processing.
    Search-linked reassessment and cross-examination requirements shape Section 68 scrutiny; reassessment upheld, additions remanded for fresh inquiry.
    Valid issuance of reassessment notice must be proved within limitation; section 292BB cannot cure a jurisdictional defect.
    Redevelopment flat exchange falls outside section 56(2)(x), so the deemed income addition was deleted in full.
    Indirect transfer taxation: offshore share sale not taxable in India, so no withholding obligation arose under the then-prevailing law.
    Appellate enhancement without procedure cannot introduce a new head of income after section 54F controversy is resolved.
    Cash payment disallowance under section 40A(3) sustained where the assessee failed to prove the Rule 6DD exception.
    Presumptive taxation and unexplained income: rice trading receipts taxed twice under section 69A were deleted, while unsupported salary claims failed.
    Accumulation exemption under section 11(2) cannot be claimed twice, and unutilised funds become deemed income under section 11(3).
    Unjust enrichment and refund of Extra Duty Deposit: loan-funded customs payment did not defeat refund, and delayed interest was payable.
    Inconclusive laboratory testing prevented final customs classification, leading to remand for fresh testing on all relevant parameters.
    Export drawback rules: unlocking mobile phones for overseas use is configuration, so misdeclaration, confiscation, and penalties fail.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Scope of application for advance ruling - Seeking ruling on...

Advance Ruling Denied: Reapply for Each Product Separately Under Tariff Chapter 23, Heading 23.09 for Compliance.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Customs August 7, 2021 Case Laws AAR
Scope of application for advance ruling - Seeking ruling on classification of various items - 16 items grouped under 4 categories - if advance rulings in respect of multiple goods/items/products are sought in one application, then it would be well high impossible to render a ruling within the time prescribed in the statute. I can appreciate that there would be instances where the items/products etc. are so similar that they can be combined in a single application. - Therefore, there is no doubt in my mind that the applicant needs to reapply separately in respect of each of these 16 products with sufficient details to justify compliance of the conditions laid down in the note to chapter 23 of the tariff in respect of the heading 23.09. - AAR

Topics

Acts Income Tax