Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of amount paid as demurrage charges for the clearance of Ammonium Sulphate in Bulk - The petitioner was not at fault, in view of the fact that the detention made by the Customs Authorities was found to be wrong, which was subsequently clarified by the Ministry of Agriculture - this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner need not be penalised - The respondents 1 and 2 are directed to refund a sum paid by the petitioner on 05.08.2014 as demurrage charges - HC
Refund of amount paid as demurrage charges for the clearance of Ammonium Sulphate in Bulk - The petitioner was not at fault, in view of the fact that the detention made by the Customs Authorities was found to be wrong, which was subsequently clarified by the Ministry of Agriculture - this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner need not be penalised - The respondents 1 and 2 are directed to refund a sum paid by the petitioner on 05.08.2014 as demurrage charges - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
