Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Re-credit of Cenvat Credit alrady reversed (suo motu) - When the reversal/adjustment is made under Rule 6(3A), the time-limit as prescribed in the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 would apply. In the present case, the re-credit is an adjustment/correction of the excess reversal which was not required to be made by them. - the allegation of the department that the credit ought to have been take before 30th of June of the succeeding year is without any basis - Demand set aside - AT
Re-credit of Cenvat Credit alrady reversed (suo motu) - When the reversal/adjustment is made under Rule 6(3A), the time-limit as prescribed in the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 would apply. In the present case, the re-credit is an adjustment/correction of the excess reversal which was not required to be made by them. - the allegation of the department that the credit ought to have been take before 30th of June of the succeeding year is without any basis - Demand set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.