Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
CENVAT Credit - input services - The appellant did not submit the documentary evidences either before the original or first appellate authority to demonstrate that it is entitled to avail the Cenvat credit on some of the disputed services. - Since, the onus lies with the appellant for proper substantiation of the fact regarding availment of Cenvat credit on the disputed services viz., Rent-a-Cab and Travel expenses (Foreign) has not been fulfilled, the denial of Cenvat benefit on such services in the impugned order cannot be faulted. - AT
CENVAT Credit - input services - The appellant did not submit the documentary evidences either before the original or first appellate authority to demonstrate that it is entitled to avail the Cenvat credit on some of the disputed services. - Since, the onus lies with the appellant for proper substantiation of the fact regarding availment of Cenvat credit on the disputed services viz., Rent-a-Cab and Travel expenses (Foreign) has not been fulfilled, the denial of Cenvat benefit on such services in the impugned order cannot be faulted. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
