Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
CENVAT Credit - input services - The appellant did not submit the documentary evidences either before the original or first appellate authority to demonstrate that it is entitled to avail the Cenvat credit on some of the disputed services. - Since, the onus lies with the appellant for proper substantiation of the fact regarding availment of Cenvat credit on the disputed services viz., Rent-a-Cab and Travel expenses (Foreign) has not been fulfilled, the denial of Cenvat benefit on such services in the impugned order cannot be faulted. - AT
CENVAT Credit - input services - The appellant did not submit the documentary evidences either before the original or first appellate authority to demonstrate that it is entitled to avail the Cenvat credit on some of the disputed services. - Since, the onus lies with the appellant for proper substantiation of the fact regarding availment of Cenvat credit on the disputed services viz., Rent-a-Cab and Travel expenses (Foreign) has not been fulfilled, the denial of Cenvat benefit on such services in the impugned order cannot be faulted. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
