Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Refund claim for the amount of duty interest penalty paid during investigation of demand case - rejection on the ground of time bar - The appellant has admittedly filed the refund after one year from the passing of the tribunal order whereby demand was set aside. Therefore, in terms of the sub clause (ec) of clause (B) of section 11B, the refund claim filed after one year from the relevant date is clearly time bar. - Since the appellant has paid duty, interest and 25% penalty voluntary to avail the benefit of reduced penalty, it cannot be said that the amount paid is not duty and Pre-deposit. - AT
Refund claim for the amount of duty interest penalty paid during investigation of demand case - rejection on the ground of time bar - The appellant has admittedly filed the refund after one year from the passing of the tribunal order whereby demand was set aside. Therefore, in terms of the sub clause (ec) of clause (B) of section 11B, the refund claim filed after one year from the relevant date is clearly time bar. - Since the appellant has paid duty, interest and 25% penalty voluntary to avail the benefit of reduced penalty, it cannot be said that the amount paid is not duty and Pre-deposit. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.