Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Refund of erroneous payment of service tax - the appellant as a LLP, is not required to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism during the period under dispute. - It is held that the appellant is entitled to refund of the service tax paid erroneously under reverse charge, as per the refund application - the adjudicating authority is directed to grant refund within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order with interest - AT
Refund of erroneous payment of service tax - the appellant as a LLP, is not required to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism during the period under dispute. - It is held that the appellant is entitled to refund of the service tax paid erroneously under reverse charge, as per the refund application - the adjudicating authority is directed to grant refund within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order with interest - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
