Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty levied u/s 221(1) - non-payment of tax - In the instant cases, as on today, the assessment orders have been quashed by the Tribunal, vide its order dated 03-02-2021 (referred above) in the hands of both the assessee by holding that reopening of assessment is invalid. Hence, as on today, the demand has become Nil. Accordingly, as per the provisions of sub. Sec. (2) of sec. 221, the penalty levied u/s 221(1) is liable to be cancelled, if the orders passed by the Tribunal becomes final order - AT
Penalty levied u/s 221(1) - non-payment of tax - In the instant cases, as on today, the assessment orders have been quashed by the Tribunal, vide its order dated 03-02-2021 (referred above) in the hands of both the assessee by holding that reopening of assessment is invalid. Hence, as on today, the demand has become Nil. Accordingly, as per the provisions of sub. Sec. (2) of sec. 221, the penalty levied u/s 221(1) is liable to be cancelled, if the orders passed by the Tribunal becomes final order - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
