Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty levied u/s 221(1) - non-payment of tax - In the instant cases, as on today, the assessment orders have been quashed by the Tribunal, vide its order dated 03-02-2021 (referred above) in the hands of both the assessee by holding that reopening of assessment is invalid. Hence, as on today, the demand has become Nil. Accordingly, as per the provisions of sub. Sec. (2) of sec. 221, the penalty levied u/s 221(1) is liable to be cancelled, if the orders passed by the Tribunal becomes final order - AT
Penalty levied u/s 221(1) - non-payment of tax - In the instant cases, as on today, the assessment orders have been quashed by the Tribunal, vide its order dated 03-02-2021 (referred above) in the hands of both the assessee by holding that reopening of assessment is invalid. Hence, as on today, the demand has become Nil. Accordingly, as per the provisions of sub. Sec. (2) of sec. 221, the penalty levied u/s 221(1) is liable to be cancelled, if the orders passed by the Tribunal becomes final order - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
