Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Misconduct under Rule 3 of Karnataka Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966 - registration certificate issued without proper verification - Very contents of the reply submitted by respondent reveals that he is aware of loss suffered by State. As respondent admitted loss caused to the State, there is no merit in the observation that loss caused to the State was not established. - HC
Misconduct under Rule 3 of Karnataka Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966 - registration certificate issued without proper verification - Very contents of the reply submitted by respondent reveals that he is aware of loss suffered by State. As respondent admitted loss caused to the State, there is no merit in the observation that loss caused to the State was not established. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.