Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 - Violation of provisions of section 269SS - unexplained cash deposit - Violation of provisions of section 269SS of the I.T.Act calls for penalty u/s 271D of the I.T.Act, which is a separate proceeding. - Violation of provisions of section 269SS of the I.T.Act cannot be the ground for making addition u/s 68 of the I.T.Act. - AT
Addition u/s 68 - Violation of provisions of section 269SS - unexplained cash deposit - Violation of provisions of section 269SS of the I.T.Act calls for penalty u/s 271D of the I.T.Act, which is a separate proceeding. - Violation of provisions of section 269SS of the I.T.Act cannot be the ground for making addition u/s 68 of the I.T.Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
