Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessment u/s 153C - There are three paragraphs in this note; in the first para, he made reference of the facts, and in the second para he wrote that books of the accounts belonging to the assessee of the alleged seizure referred by the AO be construed as books of accounts belonging to the assessee. These documents do not contain names; even page no.3 of Annexure A/2 did not reflect to whom cash was given. There is no reference to this page. - there is no material with the Revenue to form a belief that action under section 153C is required to be taken against the assessee in these two assessment years. - AT
Assessment u/s 153C - There are three paragraphs in this note; in the first para, he made reference of the facts, and in the second para he wrote that books of the accounts belonging to the assessee of the alleged seizure referred by the AO be construed as books of accounts belonging to the assessee. These documents do not contain names; even page no.3 of Annexure A/2 did not reflect to whom cash was given. There is no reference to this page. - there is no material with the Revenue to form a belief that action under section 153C is required to be taken against the assessee in these two assessment years. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
