Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Revision u/s 263 - deduction under section 54B - No doubt the assessee declared capital gain but, whether its exemption can be claimed on purchase of other agriculture land, is not at all examined by the AO - the ld. PCIT validly assumed his jurisdiction for exercising his power u/s 263 by taking view that the order passed by AO is erroneous and in so far as prejudicial to the interest of justice. - Facts remained that the ld. PCIT passed the impugned order without considering various pleas of the assessee raised in its reply. - Matter restored back - AT
Revision u/s 263 - deduction under section 54B - No doubt the assessee declared capital gain but, whether its exemption can be claimed on purchase of other agriculture land, is not at all examined by the AO - the ld. PCIT validly assumed his jurisdiction for exercising his power u/s 263 by taking view that the order passed by AO is erroneous and in so far as prejudicial to the interest of justice. - Facts remained that the ld. PCIT passed the impugned order without considering various pleas of the assessee raised in its reply. - Matter restored back - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.