Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Revision u/s 263 - deduction under section 54B - No doubt the assessee declared capital gain but, whether its exemption can be claimed on purchase of other agriculture land, is not at all examined by the AO - the ld. PCIT validly assumed his jurisdiction for exercising his power u/s 263 by taking view that the order passed by AO is erroneous and in so far as prejudicial to the interest of justice. - Facts remained that the ld. PCIT passed the impugned order without considering various pleas of the assessee raised in its reply. - Matter restored back - AT
Revision u/s 263 - deduction under section 54B - No doubt the assessee declared capital gain but, whether its exemption can be claimed on purchase of other agriculture land, is not at all examined by the AO - the ld. PCIT validly assumed his jurisdiction for exercising his power u/s 263 by taking view that the order passed by AO is erroneous and in so far as prejudicial to the interest of justice. - Facts remained that the ld. PCIT passed the impugned order without considering various pleas of the assessee raised in its reply. - Matter restored back - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.