Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 - deduction under section 54B - No doubt the assessee declared capital gain but, whether its exemption can be claimed on purchase of other agriculture land, is not at all examined by the AO - the ld. PCIT validly assumed his jurisdiction for exercising his power u/s 263 by taking view that the order passed by AO is erroneous and in so far as prejudicial to the interest of justice. - Facts remained that the ld. PCIT passed the impugned order without considering various pleas of the assessee raised in its reply. - Matter restored back - AT
Revision u/s 263 - deduction under section 54B - No doubt the assessee declared capital gain but, whether its exemption can be claimed on purchase of other agriculture land, is not at all examined by the AO - the ld. PCIT validly assumed his jurisdiction for exercising his power u/s 263 by taking view that the order passed by AO is erroneous and in so far as prejudicial to the interest of justice. - Facts remained that the ld. PCIT passed the impugned order without considering various pleas of the assessee raised in its reply. - Matter restored back - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.