Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3481 to 3500 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 - deduction under section 54B - No doubt the assessee declared capital gain but, whether its exemption can be claimed on purchase of other agriculture land, is not at all examined by the AO - the ld. PCIT validly assumed his jurisdiction for exercising his power u/s 263 by taking view that the order passed by AO is erroneous and in so far as prejudicial to the interest of justice. - Facts remained that the ld. PCIT passed the impugned order without considering various pleas of the assessee raised in its reply. - Matter restored back - AT
Revision u/s 263 - deduction under section 54B - No doubt the assessee declared capital gain but, whether its exemption can be claimed on purchase of other agriculture land, is not at all examined by the AO - the ld. PCIT validly assumed his jurisdiction for exercising his power u/s 263 by taking view that the order passed by AO is erroneous and in so far as prejudicial to the interest of justice. - Facts remained that the ld. PCIT passed the impugned order without considering various pleas of the assessee raised in its reply. - Matter restored back - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
