Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Authority to undertake a review contemplated under Section 67(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax, 2005 - since the regular Chairman of the Tribunal is not functioning, the petitioner has no other go except filing a review petition before ACAR. - the petitioner shall withdraw the appeal pending before the VAT Tribunal and then only proceed with the review petition - the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the review petition dated 14.12.2020 filed by the petitioner and afford personal hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders - HC
Authority to undertake a review contemplated under Section 67(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax, 2005 - since the regular Chairman of the Tribunal is not functioning, the petitioner has no other go except filing a review petition before ACAR. - the petitioner shall withdraw the appeal pending before the VAT Tribunal and then only proceed with the review petition - the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the review petition dated 14.12.2020 filed by the petitioner and afford personal hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.