Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Authority to undertake a review contemplated under Section 67(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax, 2005 - since the regular Chairman of the Tribunal is not functioning, the petitioner has no other go except filing a review petition before ACAR. - the petitioner shall withdraw the appeal pending before the VAT Tribunal and then only proceed with the review petition - the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the review petition dated 14.12.2020 filed by the petitioner and afford personal hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders - HC
Authority to undertake a review contemplated under Section 67(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax, 2005 - since the regular Chairman of the Tribunal is not functioning, the petitioner has no other go except filing a review petition before ACAR. - the petitioner shall withdraw the appeal pending before the VAT Tribunal and then only proceed with the review petition - the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the review petition dated 14.12.2020 filed by the petitioner and afford personal hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.