Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Authority to undertake a review contemplated under Section 67(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax, 2005 - since the regular Chairman of the Tribunal is not functioning, the petitioner has no other go except filing a review petition before ACAR. - the petitioner shall withdraw the appeal pending before the VAT Tribunal and then only proceed with the review petition - the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the review petition dated 14.12.2020 filed by the petitioner and afford personal hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders - HC
Authority to undertake a review contemplated under Section 67(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax, 2005 - since the regular Chairman of the Tribunal is not functioning, the petitioner has no other go except filing a review petition before ACAR. - the petitioner shall withdraw the appeal pending before the VAT Tribunal and then only proceed with the review petition - the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the review petition dated 14.12.2020 filed by the petitioner and afford personal hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.