Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of service tax - booking of flat cancelled - Time Limitation - There are no doubt the service tax was deposited by the appellant on 4th October, 2016 and 24 October, 2016 and the refund claim has been filed on 7th May, 2018 which is absolutely beyond one year from the date of deposit. - the date of adjustment in the present case is the date when the money received by appellant need to be refunded alongwith the amount of service tax. - The period of one year, in the given facts and circumstances, shall reckon from 15.10.2017 when appellant returned the amount of sale consideration - The refund claim filed on 7th May, 2018 therefore, stands very much within the period of one year - AT
Refund of service tax - booking of flat cancelled - Time Limitation - There are no doubt the service tax was deposited by the appellant on 4th October, 2016 and 24 October, 2016 and the refund claim has been filed on 7th May, 2018 which is absolutely beyond one year from the date of deposit. - the date of adjustment in the present case is the date when the money received by appellant need to be refunded alongwith the amount of service tax. - The period of one year, in the given facts and circumstances, shall reckon from 15.10.2017 when appellant returned the amount of sale consideration - The refund claim filed on 7th May, 2018 therefore, stands very much within the period of one year - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
