Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Validity of reassessment order passed u/s 39(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax - barred by limitation or not - It is pertinent to note that Section 40(2) of the Act applies to a case of a dealer who is unregistered and who has not paid taxes and has fraudulently failed to pay tax which results in punishment under Section 79 of the Act - the condition precedent for invocation of Section 40(2) of the Act have not been fulfilled in the case of the respondent and hence, the aforesaid provision does not apply to the case of the respondent. - the proceeding has to be held to be barred by limitation in view of the period of limitation prescribed under Section 46(1) of the Act. - HC
Validity of reassessment order passed u/s 39(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax - barred by limitation or not - It is pertinent to note that Section 40(2) of the Act applies to a case of a dealer who is unregistered and who has not paid taxes and has fraudulently failed to pay tax which results in punishment under Section 79 of the Act - the condition precedent for invocation of Section 40(2) of the Act have not been fulfilled in the case of the respondent and hence, the aforesaid provision does not apply to the case of the respondent. - the proceeding has to be held to be barred by limitation in view of the period of limitation prescribed under Section 46(1) of the Act. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
