Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 - Once the valuation report has not been sent by the valuation officer to the assessing officer/assessee, within the period stipulated by the act that alleged report cannot found basis of "RECORD" to invoke the judicial under section 263 by the revisional Commissioner. - Merely the assessing officer has formed an opinion which is not in line of thinking of the revisional Commissioner and there are two possible views, then also the revisional Commissioner cannot exercise the power for provision under section 263 - AT
Revision u/s 263 - Once the valuation report has not been sent by the valuation officer to the assessing officer/assessee, within the period stipulated by the act that alleged report cannot found basis of "RECORD" to invoke the judicial under section 263 by the revisional Commissioner. - Merely the assessing officer has formed an opinion which is not in line of thinking of the revisional Commissioner and there are two possible views, then also the revisional Commissioner cannot exercise the power for provision under section 263 - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.