PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Levy of penalty u/s 112 (b) of the Customs Act - appellant did not file the IGMs in question - Undisputed peculiar facts of the case are that the appellant is neither the importer nor the owner who had acquired possession nor in any way concerned with the carrying, removing, etc., of the goods in question, and Revenue has nowhere ascribed knowledge of the appellant as to the confiscation - the Revenue has also nowhere offered redemption in lieu of the confiscation in so far as the appellant is concerned - No penalty - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 112 (b) of the Customs Act - appellant did not file the IGMs in question - Undisputed peculiar facts of the case are that the appellant is neither the importer nor the owner who had acquired possession nor in any way concerned with the carrying, removing, etc., of the goods in question, and Revenue has nowhere ascribed knowledge of the appellant as to the confiscation - the Revenue has also nowhere offered redemption in lieu of the confiscation in so far as the appellant is concerned - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
