Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
100% EOU - refund of unutilized CENVAT credit - time limitation - After the introduction of GST in July 2017, there is no option provided to the noticee to avail CENVAT credit, as the returns have been suspended with regard to erstwhile regime. Consequently, the noticee filed the refund of the amount debited in excess in terms of provision 142(3) of CGST Act which was allowed as credit. - The impugned order denying the refund by invoking Section 142(3) of CGST is not sustainable in law - AT
100% EOU - refund of unutilized CENVAT credit - time limitation - After the introduction of GST in July 2017, there is no option provided to the noticee to avail CENVAT credit, as the returns have been suspended with regard to erstwhile regime. Consequently, the noticee filed the refund of the amount debited in excess in terms of provision 142(3) of CGST Act which was allowed as credit. - The impugned order denying the refund by invoking Section 142(3) of CGST is not sustainable in law - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.