Statutory transfer formalities invalidated alleged share and property transfers, while retrospective record manipulation constituted oppression and mi...
Provisional attachment of laundered funds and equivalent-value property sustained, with statutory protection limited to pension, gratuity and providen...
Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings...
100% EOU - refund of unutilized CENVAT credit - time limitation - After the introduction of GST in July 2017, there is no option provided to the noticee to avail CENVAT credit, as the returns have been suspended with regard to erstwhile regime. Consequently, the noticee filed the refund of the amount debited in excess in terms of provision 142(3) of CGST Act which was allowed as credit. - The impugned order denying the refund by invoking Section 142(3) of CGST is not sustainable in law - AT
100% EOU - refund of unutilized CENVAT credit - time limitation - After the introduction of GST in July 2017, there is no option provided to the noticee to avail CENVAT credit, as the returns have been suspended with regard to erstwhile regime. Consequently, the noticee filed the refund of the amount debited in excess in terms of provision 142(3) of CGST Act which was allowed as credit. - The impugned order denying the refund by invoking Section 142(3) of CGST is not sustainable in law - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.