Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
541 to 560 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Once the credit of education cess and secondary education cess is specifically disallowed to be carried forward as transitional credit, they remain and retain their character as education cess and secondary education cess as cenvat credit as per Rule 3 of CCR, 2004. Since there is no finding on the merit by the learned Commissioner(Appeals), it will not be appropriate to decide the appeal on merits. The dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance of mandatory predeposit is not justified in law when the appellant has already paid the entire duty by debiting the cenvat credit account. - AT
Once the credit of education cess and secondary education cess is specifically disallowed to be carried forward as transitional credit, they remain and retain their character as education cess and secondary education cess as cenvat credit as per Rule 3 of CCR, 2004. Since there is no finding on the merit by the learned Commissioner(Appeals), it will not be appropriate to decide the appeal on merits. The dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance of mandatory predeposit is not justified in law when the appellant has already paid the entire duty by debiting the cenvat credit account. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.