Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Refund of pre-deposit - Unjust Enrichment - Amount credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund - The attempt to persuade us that this absurdity has been legislatively intended does not evoke resonance from us. It would not be wrong to posit that ‘predeposit’ is contingent not upon orders of the Tribunal but on carrying disputes to the Tribunal. - the competent authorities are directed to ensure compliance with circular - AT
Refund of pre-deposit - Unjust Enrichment - Amount credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund - The attempt to persuade us that this absurdity has been legislatively intended does not evoke resonance from us. It would not be wrong to posit that ‘predeposit’ is contingent not upon orders of the Tribunal but on carrying disputes to the Tribunal. - the competent authorities are directed to ensure compliance with circular - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.