Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Exemption u/s 11 - DIT(E) cancelled the registration u/s 12AA of the Act on the ground that the assessee violated the provision of section 13(3) of the Act for taking loan and donating the same to the sister concern without carrying out any charitable activity - - Undisputedly, the words as obtained registration at any time was inserted in section 12AA(3) of the Act w.e.f 01.06.2010. DIT(E) has cancelled the registration since inception - as contended by assessee that the cancellation could not have been made prior to the insertion of the provision thus, the DIT(E) clearly exceeded the jurisdiction. - AT
Exemption u/s 11 - DIT(E) cancelled the registration u/s 12AA of the Act on the ground that the assessee violated the provision of section 13(3) of the Act for taking loan and donating the same to the sister concern without carrying out any charitable activity - - Undisputedly, the words as obtained registration at any time was inserted in section 12AA(3) of the Act w.e.f 01.06.2010. DIT(E) has cancelled the registration since inception - as contended by assessee that the cancellation could not have been made prior to the insertion of the provision thus, the DIT(E) clearly exceeded the jurisdiction. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.