Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Revision u/s 263 - non application of mind by AO on search figures of income - PCIT has not brought any material to justify the alleged income of ₹ 210 crores. Thus, we note that allegation made by the ld PCIT is based merely on suspicion and conjecture. A mere observation that no proper details have been obtained, cannot be sufficient to come to a conclusion that the assessing officer did not make proper and adequate inquiries which he ought to have made in the given facts and circumstances of this case. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - non application of mind by AO on search figures of income - PCIT has not brought any material to justify the alleged income of ₹ 210 crores. Thus, we note that allegation made by the ld PCIT is based merely on suspicion and conjecture. A mere observation that no proper details have been obtained, cannot be sufficient to come to a conclusion that the assessing officer did not make proper and adequate inquiries which he ought to have made in the given facts and circumstances of this case. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
