Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Revision u/s 263 - non application of mind by AO on search figures of income - PCIT has not brought any material to justify the alleged income of ₹ 210 crores. Thus, we note that allegation made by the ld PCIT is based merely on suspicion and conjecture. A mere observation that no proper details have been obtained, cannot be sufficient to come to a conclusion that the assessing officer did not make proper and adequate inquiries which he ought to have made in the given facts and circumstances of this case. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - non application of mind by AO on search figures of income - PCIT has not brought any material to justify the alleged income of ₹ 210 crores. Thus, we note that allegation made by the ld PCIT is based merely on suspicion and conjecture. A mere observation that no proper details have been obtained, cannot be sufficient to come to a conclusion that the assessing officer did not make proper and adequate inquiries which he ought to have made in the given facts and circumstances of this case. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.