Promissory note presumption of consideration survives blank-signature and income-tax non-disclosure objections when admissions and attesting evidence ...
Charitable registration cancellation: limitation and jurisdiction upheld, but withdrawal quashed under discontinued provisions for skill-development e...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1421 to 1440 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - rejection of refund on the ground that credit was transferred to GST regime through TRAN-1 - it is not a case that the appellant has carried forward ineligible credit into TRAN-1. The credit so transferred by the appellant were eligible credit; the refund was rejected on the ground of time bar and subsequently rejected under GST by invoking the Section 142(3) of the CGST Act 2017. - Matter remanded back to the original authority with a direction that TRAN-1 credit taken by the appellant be directed to be reversed and thereafter the original authority will consider the directions given - AT
Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - rejection of refund on the ground that credit was transferred to GST regime through TRAN-1 - it is not a case that the appellant has carried forward ineligible credit into TRAN-1. The credit so transferred by the appellant were eligible credit; the refund was rejected on the ground of time bar and subsequently rejected under GST by invoking the Section 142(3) of the CGST Act 2017. - Matter remanded back to the original authority with a direction that TRAN-1 credit taken by the appellant be directed to be reversed and thereafter the original authority will consider the directions given - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.