Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95633 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - rejection of refund on the ground that credit was transferred to GST regime through TRAN-1 - it is not a case that the appellant has carried forward ineligible credit into TRAN-1. The credit so transferred by the appellant were eligible credit; the refund was rejected on the ground of time bar and subsequently rejected under GST by invoking the Section 142(3) of the CGST Act 2017. - Matter remanded back to the original authority with a direction that TRAN-1 credit taken by the appellant be directed to be reversed and thereafter the original authority will consider the directions given - AT
Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - rejection of refund on the ground that credit was transferred to GST regime through TRAN-1 - it is not a case that the appellant has carried forward ineligible credit into TRAN-1. The credit so transferred by the appellant were eligible credit; the refund was rejected on the ground of time bar and subsequently rejected under GST by invoking the Section 142(3) of the CGST Act 2017. - Matter remanded back to the original authority with a direction that TRAN-1 credit taken by the appellant be directed to be reversed and thereafter the original authority will consider the directions given - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
