Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - rejection of refund on the ground that credit was transferred to GST regime through TRAN-1 - it is not a case that the appellant has carried forward ineligible credit into TRAN-1. The credit so transferred by the appellant were eligible credit; the refund was rejected on the ground of time bar and subsequently rejected under GST by invoking the Section 142(3) of the CGST Act 2017. - Matter remanded back to the original authority with a direction that TRAN-1 credit taken by the appellant be directed to be reversed and thereafter the original authority will consider the directions given - AT
Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - rejection of refund on the ground that credit was transferred to GST regime through TRAN-1 - it is not a case that the appellant has carried forward ineligible credit into TRAN-1. The credit so transferred by the appellant were eligible credit; the refund was rejected on the ground of time bar and subsequently rejected under GST by invoking the Section 142(3) of the CGST Act 2017. - Matter remanded back to the original authority with a direction that TRAN-1 credit taken by the appellant be directed to be reversed and thereafter the original authority will consider the directions given - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.