Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Revision u/s 263 - denial of deduction u/s 54 in the hands of Individual - Partition of HUF or not - reading of sub- section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 makes it very clear that it is applicable only where a Hindu family was already assessed as an Hindu Undivided Family(HUF). Otherwise, there is no meaning to the expression “hither to” in Section 171(1). - Where a Hindu family was never assessed as a HUF, Section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 will not apply even when there is a division or partition of property which does not answer to the above definition. - HC
Revision u/s 263 - denial of deduction u/s 54 in the hands of Individual - Partition of HUF or not - reading of sub- section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 makes it very clear that it is applicable only where a Hindu family was already assessed as an Hindu Undivided Family(HUF). Otherwise, there is no meaning to the expression “hither to” in Section 171(1). - Where a Hindu family was never assessed as a HUF, Section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 will not apply even when there is a division or partition of property which does not answer to the above definition. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
