Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Revision u/s 263 - denial of deduction u/s 54 in the hands of Individual - Partition of HUF or not - reading of sub- section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 makes it very clear that it is applicable only where a Hindu family was already assessed as an Hindu Undivided Family(HUF). Otherwise, there is no meaning to the expression “hither to” in Section 171(1). - Where a Hindu family was never assessed as a HUF, Section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 will not apply even when there is a division or partition of property which does not answer to the above definition. - HC
Revision u/s 263 - denial of deduction u/s 54 in the hands of Individual - Partition of HUF or not - reading of sub- section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 makes it very clear that it is applicable only where a Hindu family was already assessed as an Hindu Undivided Family(HUF). Otherwise, there is no meaning to the expression “hither to” in Section 171(1). - Where a Hindu family was never assessed as a HUF, Section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 will not apply even when there is a division or partition of property which does not answer to the above definition. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
