Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Validity of jurisdiction assumed by AO u/s 147 - Assessment was not complete based not valuation report - While a formal rejection of books may not, at times, be possibly necessary an abstract position of law, an implied dissatisfaction on the books could not be gauged either from the original assessment or from the attendant office note. - CIT(A) has also made reference to various other judgments and has come to the conclusion that ingredients of Section 147 of the Act are not fulfilled in the instant case and consequently reopening is not permissible in the facts and circumstances of the case - AT
Validity of jurisdiction assumed by AO u/s 147 - Assessment was not complete based not valuation report - While a formal rejection of books may not, at times, be possibly necessary an abstract position of law, an implied dissatisfaction on the books could not be gauged either from the original assessment or from the attendant office note. - CIT(A) has also made reference to various other judgments and has come to the conclusion that ingredients of Section 147 of the Act are not fulfilled in the instant case and consequently reopening is not permissible in the facts and circumstances of the case - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
