Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJune 11, 2021Case LawsTri
Encashment of Bank Guarantees during CIRP period - scope of moratorium u/s 14 of IBC - If bank guarantee is beyond the mentioned amount in the bank guarantee, if the bank guarantee is encashed by indulging into fraud behind the back of the Banks, then it could be understood that this Contract is vitiated the fraud, but in this case, the bank guarantees have remained same and the Corporate Debtor has taken additional financial support to accomplish the contract work. Such availing additional financial support cannot mean that Banks are absolved from the obligation of discharging their part of contract - The Corporate Debtor taking an additional financial support or IOCL not reducing the advance amount from the running bills will not tantamount to indulge in fraud, therefore IOCL is at liberty to encash the bank guarantees. - Tri
Encashment of Bank Guarantees during CIRP period - scope of moratorium u/s 14 of IBC - If bank guarantee is beyond the mentioned amount in the bank guarantee, if the bank guarantee is encashed by indulging into fraud behind the back of the Banks, then it could be understood that this Contract is vitiated the fraud, but in this case, the bank guarantees have remained same and the Corporate Debtor has taken additional financial support to accomplish the contract work. Such availing additional financial support cannot mean that Banks are absolved from the obligation of discharging their part of contract - The Corporate Debtor taking an additional financial support or IOCL not reducing the advance amount from the running bills will not tantamount to indulge in fraud, therefore IOCL is at liberty to encash the bank guarantees. - Tri
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.